On today’s episode of Decoder, we’re talking about antitrust policy and tech, which is at a particularly weird moment as we enter the second Trump administration.
Tech antitrust is about to get really weird


A lot of tech policy is at a weird moment, actually, but antitrust might be the weirdest of them all — the pendulum has swung back and forth on antitrust policy pretty wildly over the past few years, and it’s about to swing again under Trump. So I asked Leah Nylen, an antitrust reporter for Bloomberg and a leading expert on this subject, to come on the show and help break it all down.
If you’re a Decoder listener, you know that the basic frameworks of antitrust in the US were more or less the same since Ronald Reagan took office in 1981, all the way through President Barack Obama and the first Trump administration.
But in the Biden administration, FTC Chair Lina Khan and DOJ antitrust chief Jonathan Kanter have taken a big, bold, aggressive approach to antitrust not really seen in this country in many of our lifetimes. Kanter has been on Decoder twice in the past year to talk about this approach and what it means. After all, Amazon, Apple, and Meta are all facing major antitrust suits, and Microsoft is now under investigation, too. And then there’s Google, which is potentially staring down a breakup after already losing one major antitrust suit, with a ruling in a second one about advertising due basically any day now.
A lot of this regulatory pressure has been designed to avoid what I like to call the “Instagram problem,” where everyone wishes the governments of the world had prevented Facebook from buying Instagram in 2012, but as we know, they didn’t. For pretty much the entire 2010s, the tech industry grew and consolidated through mergers and acquisitions at breakneck pace, and that’s how you ended up with a Biden administration agenda to do whatever possible to slow this down and perhaps even unwind some of it.
Some of this enforcement has been so intense that companies have even devised creative end runs around the very nature of the acquisition. Look at Inflection AI: Microsoft didn’t acquire it; rather, it hired most of the company, licensed its tech, and installed the cofounder, Mustafa Suleyman, as the CEO of its new AI division. You can’t get blocked for an acquisition deal if, on paper, you don’t really acquire anything.
Listen to Decoder, a show hosted by The Verge’s Nilay Patel about big ideas — and other problems. Subscribe here!
But now, President-elect Donald Trump is returning to the White House in a month, and he’s already named his picks to replace Khan and Kanter.
Trump’s next pick to head the FTC, current Commissioner Andrew Ferguson, pitched himself for the chairperson’s seat with a bunch of platforms like “mergers are good,” and he’s extremely supportive of big business interests — except when it comes to big tech. Both Trump and his incoming vice president, JD Vance, have spent years railing against the big tech companies for alleged political censorship and want to punish those companies, especially Google, and Ferguson’s all in.
And Trump’s pick to run antitrust at the DOJ is Gail Slater, who seems poised to keep some of the big antitrust cases alive.
That leads to a couple of deeply strange tensions, as you’ll hear Leah really get into. On the one hand, the incoming administration is fine with letting big companies become huge ones — but it might also support a potential Google breakup, not because Google behaved anticompetitively, but because Google’s position as a monopolist gives it the power to enforce limits on speech in a way conservatives don’t like.
There is a lot going on here, and there are a ton of open questions. All the big tech companies would love to believe we’re heading into an era of less enforcement, a blind eye to big deals, and back to business as usual. But are we really going to see a big reversal of the last four years, one that means big tech gets to breathe a sigh of relief and spin up the acquisition machine again?
Or could we see a world where a weird kind of bipartisan antitrust effort lives on into Trump’s second term? Leah’s one of the sharpest people I know to ask these questions — but as you’ll hear her say, there are a lot of wild cards here.
If you’d like to read more about what we talked about in this episode, start here:
- Trump’s antitrust trio heralds Big Tech crackdown to continue | Bloomberg
- Trump picks FTC Commissioner Andrew Ferguson to lead the agency | Politico
- Trump picks Gail Slater to head Justice Department’s antitrust division | Reuters
- Trump names Brendan Carr as his FCC leader | The Verge
- Trump’s FTC pick promises to go after ‘censorship’ from tech companies | The Verge
- Breaking down the DOJ’s plan to end Google’s search monopoly | The Verge
- US v. Google redux: all the news from the ad tech trial | The Verge
- Tech leaders kiss the ring | The Verge
- DOJ antitrust chief is ‘overjoyed’ after Google monopoly verdict | Decoder
- This is Big Tech’s playbook for swallowing the AI industry | Command Line
Decoder with Nilay Patel /
A podcast from The Verge about big ideas and other problems.
On today’s episode of Decoder, we’re talking about antitrust policy and tech, which is at a particularly weird moment as we enter the second Trump administration. A lot of tech policy is at a weird moment, actually, but antitrust might be the weirdest of them all — the pendulum has…
Recent Posts
- DJI’s drone-in-a-box can now launch from moving vehicles
- We might have our first look at the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 7, but I can’t tell the difference from the Z Flip 6
- AMD’s Radeon 9070 and 9070 XT are gunning for NVIDIA’s mid-range throne
- The Rings of Power season 3 adds Stranger Things’ Jamie Campbell Bower and Heartstopper’s Eddie Marsan to its cast, and I think they’re perfect for two specific roles
- The iPhone 16e doesn’t have MagSafe, but apparently Apple thinks you didn’t want it anyway
Archives
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2018
- October 2017
- December 2011
- August 2010