Is Facebook serious about combating Covid-19 misinfo?


The question in the headline is not a rhetorical one. It is now being increasingly asked after a media investigative effort found Facebook was allowing advertisers to profit from ads targeting people interested in ‘pseudoscience.’ And as it happens, Facebook seems to be maintaining a “pseudoscience” ad category group for several years.
As per Facebook’s ad portal, the pseudoscience interest category contained more than 78 million people.
The investigative work was carried out by The Mark Up, which “is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates how powerful institutions are using technology to change our society.”
The news outlet paid Facebook to carry an advertisement targeting people interested in pseudoscience. The ad was apparently approved by the social media platform.
The ad, targeting the youth segment, was also featured in Instagram, the platform owned by Facebook.
Zuckerberg’s strong words
Facebook has responded to the report saying that it has eliminated the ‘pseudoscience’ category (in ads).
But the social media platform’s clarifications seem to ring hollow, especially only recently its CEO Mark Zuckerberg had claimed, “we’re also continuing our efforts to reduce misinformation. Since the beginning of March, we’ve expanded our fact-checking coverage to more than a dozen new countries and now work with over 60 fact-checking organizations that review content in more than 50 languages.” He added: “We’ve taken down hundreds of thousands of pieces of misinformation related to Covid-19.”
Faebook had also said that it was banning ads if they attempt to “create a sense of urgency” around the virus or promise to cure it.
In spite of such strong words that a media company could place an ad and target people on the peg of ‘pseudoscience’ is disturbing. Another media experiment also showed that dubious ads could be placed on Facebook.
As the Covid-19 virus spreads across the world, so have disturbing conspiracy theories. And on Facebook itself, there are apparently still many pages that propagate dangerous conspiracy ideas on the coronavirus.
Experts feel that Facebook now needs to put its money where its mouth is.
The question in the headline is not a rhetorical one. It is now being increasingly asked after a media investigative effort found Facebook was allowing advertisers to profit from ads targeting people interested in ‘pseudoscience.’ And as it happens, Facebook seems to be maintaining a “pseudoscience” ad category group for…
Recent Posts
- The GSA is shutting down its EV chargers, calling them ‘not mission critical’
- Lenovo is going all out with yet another funky laptop design: this time, it’s a business notebook with a foldable OLED screen
- Elon Musk’s first month of destroying America will cost us decades
- Fortnite’s new season leans heavily on heist mechanics
- I installed iOS 18.4 dev beta and the big Siri intelligence update is nowhere to be found
Archives
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2018
- October 2017
- December 2011
- August 2010