Intel’s Core i9 CPUs are still having some serious issues – but Intel insists it’s your motherboard’s fault

Intel has been in hot water lately, with numerous reports of 13th- and 14th-gen i9 processors crashing while playing games and, in some cases, refusing to boot Windows altogether. Now Intel has released an official statement on the fiasco, but it’s probably not what users want to hear.
The blame game has been in full swing over the past few weeks, with PCGamer reporting that Epic Games publicly called out Intel over the issues. In a new statement provided to German tech news site Igor’s Lab, Intel has now placed the blame on motherboard makers for failing to properly implement “thermal and power delivery safeguards”. Intel says that it’s the motherboard’s fault that the chip is overheating – a bold stance for the chipmaker to take.
There have been some attempts to rectify the problems, with Asus releasing a motherboard BIOS patch, but the trouble is far from over. Gigabyte’s solution caused CPU performance to take a hit, angering some users who had already shelled out for a high-end new Core i9 CPU.
Is a fix incoming?
The affected chips span across two CPU generations, but both are built on the same chip microarchitecture: Intel’s 13th- and 14th-gen i9 processors use the Raptor Lake and Raptor Lake Refresh architectures respectively, hence why both have been affected. As far as we can tell, the issue is isolated to desktop chips – so don’t panic if you’ve just bought a shiny new gaming laptop with an i9-14900HX.
Intel admits in its statement that while it’s “continuing to actively investigate this issue” it hasn’t found the cause of the problem. The crashes appear to be related to power and thermal issues; basically, the chip draws too much power, overheats, and shuts off to prevent damage. Intel also provided a short list of other things that could cause system instability, which include using Windows Ultimate Performance mode and disabling processor C-states, as well as overclocking in general – all things that PC gamers might do to boost in-game performance, which is annoying.
As for what Intel is advising users to do, well… there’s not much to say. The statement seems to be directed more to motherboard makers than consumers, saying that “Intel strongly recommends customer’s default BIOS settings should ensure operation within Intel’s recommended settings”. In other words, not our problem.
Intel’s i9 chips are power-hungry beasts, with the i9-13900K reaching a staggering peak power draw of 337W in our review testing, and Intel even introduced a new ‘Extreme Power Delivery’ profile for its 13th-gen CPUs, so it’s perhaps unsurprising that the chips have been hit with thermal safety issues.
Get the hottest deals available in your inbox plus news, reviews, opinion, analysis and more from the TechRadar team.
It’s a bit dispiriting to see Intel refuse to take accountability for this problem, especially since these i9 desktop chips are rather expensive. However, the CPU giant has said that it also intends to release another statement with more information in May, so that could change. And at least these problematic chips aren’t literally melting people’s components.
We have reached out to Intel for comment and will update this article if we receive a response.
You might also like…
Intel has been in hot water lately, with numerous reports of 13th- and 14th-gen i9 processors crashing while playing games and, in some cases, refusing to boot Windows altogether. Now Intel has released an official statement on the fiasco, but it’s probably not what users want to hear. The blame…
Recent Posts
- An obscure French startup just launched the cheapest true 5K monitor in the world right now and I can’t wait to test it
- Google Meet’s AI transcripts will automatically create action items for you
- No, it’s not an April fool, Intel debuts open source AI offering that gauges a text’s politeness level
- It’s clearly time: all the news about the transparent tech renaissance
- Windows 11 24H2 hasn’t raised the bar for the operating system’s CPU requirements, Microsoft clarifies
Archives
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2018
- October 2017
- December 2011
- August 2010