Google’s Fitbit Ionic recall doesn’t go far enough, lawsuit says

In March, Google announced it was voluntarily recalling 1.7 million Fitbit Ionic smartwatches following reports of 78 burns. Now, a recently filed lawsuit says the recall didn’t go far enough, claiming that the same defect affects all of Google’s Fitbit devices.
According to the court documents, all Fitbit smartwatches and fitness trackers share the same defect — a tendency to overheat, thereby causing burns or creating fire hazards. The complaint also accuses Fitbit of trying to deflect blame onto “consumer hygiene” when incidents are reported, and that the recall doesn’t adequately compensate Ionic owners.
“Reasonable consumers,” the complaint reads, “purchase the Products to burn calories — not their skin — and to safely pursue a healthy lifestyle with the aid of a smartwatch.” The lawsuit’s seeking class-action status.
The two plaintiffs in the case had both bought devices from the Versa lineup — a Versa Lite and a Versa 2 — not the Ionic. Additionally, the complaint shows photos of burns from users who had other devices, including the Sense, Versa 3, Blaze, Inspire, and Inspire 2. It also includes multiple accounts of Fitbit owners being ghosted by the company’s customer support.

The crux of the lawsuit is an allegation that while Fitbit did recall the Ionic, it hasn’t done so for its other devices even though they may also burn users. As a result, customers may be unaware that they are carrying a potential fire hazard. Specifically, the case stokes fears that customers might wear a smartwatch on a flight, not knowing that the battery may be defective. It also notes that while Fitbit offered full refunds to Ionic owners, the company is dragging its feet when it comes to issuing those refunds.
I can’t say I’m terribly surprised to see these allegations. While I have never experienced the issue while reviewing Fitbit’s devices, I’ve seen multiple complaints pop up on Reddit and other social media platforms over the years, where various Fitbit products allegedly burned or irritated users’ skin. While anecdotal, many of those accounts also referenced Fitbit taking months to issue refunds or even respond.
The court documents similarly include several screenshots of replies to the @FitbitSupport Twitter where customers were frustrated with long waits and unresponsive customer service while trying to get refunds for the recently recalled Ionic. We’ve also independently heard from a tipster that the Ionic recall process has been slow going.
Fitbit didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
In March, Google announced it was voluntarily recalling 1.7 million Fitbit Ionic smartwatches following reports of 78 burns. Now, a recently filed lawsuit says the recall didn’t go far enough, claiming that the same defect affects all of Google’s Fitbit devices. According to the court documents, all Fitbit smartwatches and…
Recent Posts
Archives
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2018
- October 2017
- December 2011
- August 2010