FTC pushes to ban Meta from profiting off children’s data


On Wednesday, the Federal Trade Commission proposed sweeping changes to how Meta operates, accusing the company of violating a suite of child privacy protections, including the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA).
In a press release, the agency alleged that Meta violated a 2020 privacy order it had reached with the agency to resolve its role in the Cambridge Analytica scandal. The proposal cites instances in which the company misled parents on the extent of their abilities to control who their children communicate with over services like Messenger Kids and misrepresented the access the company grants third-party app developers to private user data.
“Facebook has repeatedly violated its privacy promises,” said Samuel Levine, FTC consumer protection bureau director. “The company’s recklessness has put young users at risk and Facebook needs to answer for its failures.”
The FTC’s proposed changes would ban Meta, Facebook, and the rest of the company’s properties from monetizing the data of children under 18 years old. It would also bar the company from launching new products or services without the green light from an independent privacy assessor and would require explicit user consent for any new uses of facial recognition technology.
These new rules would apply to Facebook and Meta’s other platforms, including Instagram, Oculus, and WhatsApp. It would also cover any new companies Meta could merge with in the future.
Responding to the FTC’s Wednesday proposal, Meta spokesperson Andy Stone called it a “political stunt,” accusing the agency of attempting to “usurp the authority of Congress to set industry-wide standards.”
“FTC Chair Lina Khan’s insistence on using any measure — however baseless — to antagonize American business has reached a new low,” Stone said in a statement to The Verge Wednesday. “We will vigorously fight this action and expect to prevail.”
Despite voting to move forward with the proposal, Commissioner Alvaro Bedoya issued a statement casting doubt on the FTC’s authority to modify its orders in this manner. “I look forward to hearing additional information and arguments and will consider these issues with an open mind,” he said.
The alleged violations arose from an independent assessor’s review of Meta’s privacy protections. The assessor was first implemented following the 2020 order and put in charge of reviewing whether Meta’s privacy protections met the FTC’s standards. According to the FTC, the assessor “identified several gaps and weaknesses” in the company’s privacy practices.
The FTC’s proposal is just the first step in a process to heighten Meta’s privacy and security practices. According to the Wednesday press release, the FTC has asked Meta to respond within 30 days to its findings and proposal. After receiving Meta’s response, the agency would then vote on whether to alter or adopt the proposed rules.
On Wednesday, the Federal Trade Commission proposed sweeping changes to how Meta operates, accusing the company of violating a suite of child privacy protections, including the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act (COPPA). In a press release, the agency alleged that Meta violated a 2020 privacy order it had reached with…
Recent Posts
- Mozilla is already revising its new Firefox terms to clarify how it handles user data
- How to watch Brit Awards 2025 online from anywhere and for free
- Google’s co-founder tells AI staff to stop ‘building nanny products’
- Around $40 billion worth of illicit crypto transactions took place in 2024
- Zapier says someone broke into its code repositories and may have accessed customer data
Archives
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2018
- October 2017
- December 2011
- August 2010