Democrats want to know if Amazon ‘lied’ about using platform data to create products


Two US lawmakers spearheading an antitrust investigation into Amazon are looking into whether a top company official lied before Congress about whether the e-commerce giant uses independent seller data to create its own products and unfairly compete on its platform.
In a report Thursday, the Wall Street Journal wrote that Amazon employees used independent seller data to develop the company’s own competing products. In one case, Amazon employees allegedly analyzed the sales and profit margins of a car-trunk organizer created by a third-party seller, using it to make a decision about launching a directly competing product.
Over the last few months, the House Judiciary Committee has been engaged in an antitrust investigation looking into Big Tech companies, including Amazon. The two lawmakers at the forefront of that probe, Reps. Jerry Nadler (D-NY) and David Cicilline (D-RI), put out statements responding to the Journal calling on Amazon to clarify previous statements made to the committee that appear to contradict the report’s findings.
“It is deeply concerning that, beginning with the hearing last year, they may have misled Congress rather than be fully forthcoming on this matter, notwithstanding our repeated requests in this regard,” Nadler said in a statement.
“At best, Amazon’s witness appears to have misrepresented key aspects of Amazon’s business practices while omitting important details in response to pointed questioning,” Cicilline said Thursday. “At worst, the witness Amazon sent to speak on its behalf may have lied to Congress.”
Earlier on Thursday, Amazon responded to the Journal’s report saying that the company looks “at sales and store data to provide our customers with the best possible experience.” Still, the company claimed that it “strictly” prohibits employees from “using non-public, seller-specific data to determine which private label products to launch.”
Later, Amazon responded to the lawmakers’ calls for clarification and announced that it was investigating these claims internally “It’s simply incorrect to say that Amazon was intentionally misleading in our testimony,” a company spokesperson told The Verge. “While we don’t believe these claims made by the Wall Street Journal are accurate, we take these allegations very seriously and have launched an internal investigation.”
At a July 16th hearing before the House Judiciary Committee, Amazon’s associate general counsel Nate Sutton said that the company does not access seller sales data to develop its own products. “Our incentive is to help the seller succeed because we rely on them,” Sutton said.
Amazon told the Journal that any employees accessing independent seller data to create the company’s own competing products would violate its policies, but it’s not clear how Amazon enforces that policy or what safeguards it has in place to prevent employees from accessing it.
The House Judiciary Committee initially planned to release its findings from its Big Tech antitrust investigation last month, but the novel coronavirus pandemic appears to have delayed the final report. It’s not clear when the committee will go public with its findings.
“We plan to seek clarification from Amazon in short order, in light of this troubling report,” Nadler said in a statement to Recode Thursday.
Two US lawmakers spearheading an antitrust investigation into Amazon are looking into whether a top company official lied before Congress about whether the e-commerce giant uses independent seller data to create its own products and unfairly compete on its platform. In a report Thursday, the Wall Street Journal wrote that…
Recent Posts
- OpenSSH vulnerabilities could pose huge threat to businesses everywhere
- Magic: The Gathering’s Final Fantasy sets will tell the stories of the games
- All of Chipolo’s Bluetooth trackers are discounted in sitewide sale
- Fortnite: Lawless gets first trailer highlighting the new season’s battle pass roster and the chaos of Crime City
- Chase will start blocking Zelle payments over social media
Archives
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2018
- October 2017
- December 2011
- August 2010