Bored Ape Yacht Club creator wins lawsuit over copycat NFT collection


A judge has ruled in favor of Bored Ape Yacht Club creator Yuga Labs in a lawsuit against conceptual artists Ryder Ripps and Jeremy Cahen, whom Yuga Labs accused of trademark infringement over a parody of BAYC’s non-fungible token (NFT) collection. On Friday, a California court said that Yuga was entitled to protect the BAYC trademark and that Ripps and Cahen’s project, known as RR/BAYC, isn’t artistic expression protected by the First Amendment. “Defendants’ sale of RR/BAYC NFTs is no more artistic than the sale of a counterfeit handbag,” wrote US District Judge John Walter in a summary judgment.
Yuga Labs filed a lawsuit shortly after Ripps and Cahen introduced the collection, alleging the pair misused the BAYC trademarks “in an attempt to trick community members into buying their NFTs instead of the official BAYC NFTs.” It also accused the pair of engaging in false advertising that sowed “confusion” among users. Ripps did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment from The Verge.
RR/BAYC is “a collection of NFTs that point to the same online digital images as the BAYC collection”
Despite Ripps and Cahen’s claim that the RR/BAYC project is a matter of artistic expression, the court states that the series isn’t protected by the First Amendment. It’s simply “a collection of NFTs that point to the same online digital images as the BAYC collection,” the ruling states, while noting that “defendants’ NFT marketplace sales and Ape Market website contain no artistic expression or critical commentary.”
Applying copyright and trademark laws to NFTs is largely uncharted territory, and Ripps and Cahen argued that Yuga Labs transferred its trademark rights to the people who purchased BAYC NFTs. But the court was unconvinced. It cited Yuga Labs’ terms and conditions, which state that Yuga “grants each BAYC NFT holder a copyright license for both personal use and commercial use” but “not a trademark license to use the BAYC marks.”
The court also pushes back on claims that Yuga Labs actually doesn’t own trademark rights because NFTs are intangible. To back up its ruling, the court cites a recent copyright case involving the luxury fashion brand Hermès and MetaBirkins, an unauthorized NFT line that uses images of fake Birkin bags. In that case, a New York court ruled that goods don’t have to be tangible in order for trademark laws to take effect and ordered MetaBirkins creator Mason Rothschild to pay $133,000 to Hermès.
In addition to infringing on Yuga Labs’ trademark, the court says Ripps and Cahen also broke rules related to cybersquatting, or the act of registering domain names similar to trademarked brands with the hope of profiting off of a perceived connection to them. As noted by the ruling, Ripps and Cahen created and used the rrbayc.com and apemarket.com domains, both of which contained BAYC branding, which the court finds “confusingly similar” to Yuga Labs’ branding.
It’s not clear how much Ripps and Cahen could end up paying in this case. The ruling concludes that Yuga Labs is entitled to damages, but it says the amount will have to be determined in a later trial.
A judge has ruled in favor of Bored Ape Yacht Club creator Yuga Labs in a lawsuit against conceptual artists Ryder Ripps and Jeremy Cahen, whom Yuga Labs accused of trademark infringement over a parody of BAYC’s non-fungible token (NFT) collection. On Friday, a California court said that Yuga was…
Recent Posts
- Amazon just overtook Walmart in revenue for the first time
- South of Midnight’s Southern Gothic folklore world is rooted in authenticity
- What to expect at Mobile World Congress 2025: Nothing, Samsung, Xiaomi and more
- The Oppo Find N5 has made me even more excited for the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge – here’s why
- Apple Intelligence is coming to the Vision Pro
Archives
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2018
- October 2017
- December 2011
- August 2010