A Rube Goldberg chain of failures led to breach of Microsoft-hosted government emails


In the first half of July, Microsoft disclosed that the Chinese hacking group Storm-0558 had gained access to emails from around 25 organizations, including agencies in the US government. Today, the company is explaining how that happened thanks to a series of internal errors while sharply underscoring just how serious a responsibility it is to maintain massive, growing software infrastructure in an increasingly digitally insecure world.
According to Microsoft’s investigation summary, Storm-0558 was able to gain access to corporate and government emails by obtaining a “Microsoft account consumer key,” which let them create access tokens to their targets’ accounts.
Storm-0558 obtained the key after a Rube Goldberg machine-style series of events put the key somewhere it should never have been in the first place. The company writes that when the system made a debugging snapshot of a process that had crashed, it didn’t strip, as it should have, the so-called “crash dump” of all sensitive information, leaving the key in.
Microsoft’s systems still should have detected the “key material” in the crash dump, but apparently, they didn’t. So when company engineers found the dump, they assumed it was free of sensitive data and transferred it, key and all, from the “isolated production network” to the company’s debugging environment.
Then another fail-safe — a credential scan that should have also caught the key — missed that the key was there. The final gate fell when Storm-0558 managed to compromise a Microsoft engineer’s corporate account, giving the hackers access to the very debugging environment that never should have had the key to begin with.
Microsoft writes that it has no logs showing evidence this is how the key was shuffled out of its systems but says it’s the “most probable” route the hackers took.
There’s one final kicker: this was a consumer key, but it let threat actors get into enterprise Microsoft accounts. Microsoft says it began using common key metadata publishing in 2018 in response to demand for support software that worked across both consumer and enterprise accounts.
The company added that support, but it failed to make the proper updates to the systems used to authenticate keys — that is, determine whether they’re consumer or enterprise keys. Mail system engineers, assuming the updates had been made, built in no additional authentication, leaving the mail system blind to what sort of key was used.
In short, had those libraries been updated properly, even given all the other failure points, Storm-0558 hackers might not have been able to access the enterprise email accounts used by the corporations they targeted.
Microsoft says it has corrected all of the issues above, including the error that sent the signing key to the crash dump in the first place. The company adds in its post that it is “continuously hardening systems.” Microsoft has increasingly come under fire for its security practices, which both Senator Ron Wyden (D-OR) and Tenable CEO Amit Yoran have called “negligent,” with Yoran accusing Microsoft of being too slow to react to its security flaws.
In the first half of July, Microsoft disclosed that the Chinese hacking group Storm-0558 had gained access to emails from around 25 organizations, including agencies in the US government. Today, the company is explaining how that happened thanks to a series of internal errors while sharply underscoring just how serious…
Recent Posts
- HubSpot and Canva team up to level the creative playing field
- EV truck maker Nikola goes bust
- Apple TV+ releases a gritty new crime drama trailer for Dope Thief that looks like a stylish version of The Wire
- NVIDIA GeForce 5070 Ti review: A ‘sensible’ 4K powerhouse for $749
- The women who made America’s microchips and the children who paid for it
Archives
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- October 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- September 2018
- October 2017
- December 2011
- August 2010